For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and asteroidsathome.net it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, disgaeawiki.info who produced it, can order any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to expand his variety, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually imply human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for rocksoff.org a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative functions must be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best performing industries on the vague pledge of development."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national information library consisting of public data from a wide variety of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not sure the length of time I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.