Secure.gov sites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// suggests you've securely connected to the.gov site. Share delicate details only on authorities, safe and secure sites.
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Infraction
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Liberty Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as property managers and property companies along with other entities, such as towns, banks or other lending institutions and property owners insurance coverage companies whose inequitable practices make housing unavailable to individuals due to the fact that of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
disability.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department might file match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of individuals raises a concern of public importance. Where force or hazard of force is used to deny or disrupt reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers treatments for dealing with specific grievances of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have been victims of an unlawful housing practice, may file a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings matches on behalf of people based upon referrals from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. The majority of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing suppliers attempt to disguise their discrimination by offering incorrect details about availability of housing, either stating that absolutely nothing was offered or guiding homeseekers to particular areas based on race. Individuals who receive such incorrect details or misdirection may have no understanding that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought lots of cases declaring this type of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to reveal this type of hidden discrimination and hold those responsible liable. Most of the mortgage financing cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually likewise alleged that municipalities and other regional government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they denied licenses or zoning changes for housing developments, or relegated them to mainly minority neighborhoods, because the potential citizens were anticipated to be mainly African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon religion. This restriction covers instances of overt discrimination versus members of a particular religious beliefs also less direct actions, such as zoning regulations designed to restrict the use of personal homes as a places of praise. The number of cases filed since 1968 alleging religious discrimination is small in comparison to some of the other prohibited bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does include a limited exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a spiritual company to reserve such housing to persons of the exact same faith.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has actually been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, especially those who are poor, and with limited housing options, frequently have little option but to tolerate the embarrassment and deterioration of sexual harassment or danger having their households and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is aimed at property managers who create an illogical living environment by requiring sexual favors from renters or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we look for both to get relief for tenants who have actually been dealt with unjustly by a property owner due to the fact that of sex and likewise discourage other possible abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage lending might likewise adversely impact women, particularly minority women. This kind of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of a person's birth or where his/her ancestors stem. Census information show that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing sector of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus municipal governments that have actually attempted to decrease or limit the variety of Hispanic households that might live in their communities. We have sued loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have enforced more stringent underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has actually likewise sued lenders for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have experienced an increasing diversity of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This includes brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have acted versus private property owners who have actually discriminated against such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, forbids discrimination in housing against households with kids under 18. In addition to prohibiting a straight-out rejection of housing to families with kids, the Act also avoids housing suppliers from enforcing any special requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of children. For instance, landlords may not locate households with kids in any single part of a complex, put an unreasonable constraint on the total number of persons who might live in a house, or restrict their access to recreational services supplied to other occupants. In most circumstances, the modified Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing service provider from refusing to lease or sell to households with children. However, some centers may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which fulfills the standards set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might operate as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually published policies and additional guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of impairment in all types of housing transactions. The Act defines individuals with a disability to suggest those individuals with mental or physical problems that substantially limit one or more major life activities. The term psychological or physical disability might consist of conditions such as loss of sight, hearing disability, movement impairment, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, chronic tiredness, learning disability, head injury, and psychological health problem. The term major life activity might consist of seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, carrying out manual jobs, taking care of one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also secures persons who have a record of such a disability, or are concerned as having such a disability. Current users of prohibited regulated compounds, individuals founded guilty for prohibited manufacture or circulation of a controlled compound, sex culprits, and juvenile offenders are not thought about disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no securities to people with or without disabilities who present a direct risk to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone postures such a direct hazard should be made on an individualized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on basic assumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections for individuals with disabilities has actually focused on 2 significant areas. One is insuring that zoning and other guidelines concerning land usage are not employed to impede the domestic options of these people, consisting of needlessly limiting common, or gather, domestic plans, such as group homes. The 2nd location is guaranteeing that freshly constructed multifamily housing is built in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is accessible to and functional by people with specials needs, and, in particular, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination against people with disabilities, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some individuals with impairments may live together in congregate living plans, often described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act forbids municipalities and other city government entities from making zoning or land use choices or implementing land usage policies that leave out or otherwise discriminate against individuals with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To use land use policies or actions that deal with groups of individuals with impairments less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be a regulation restricting housing for persons with specials needs or a specific kind of impairment, such as mental disorder, from locating in a specific area, while permitting other groups of unassociated individuals to cohabit in that area.
- To take action against, or reject a license, for a home since of the impairment of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a structure permit for a home due to the fact that it was meant to supply housing for individuals with psychological retardation.
- To refuse to make sensible lodgings in land usage and zoning policies and treatments where such accommodations may be required to pay for persons or groups of persons with specials needs an equal chance to utilize and enjoy housing. What constitutes a reasonable lodging is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested adjustments of rules or policies are reasonable. If an asked for adjustment imposes an unnecessary financial or administrative problem on a city government, or if an adjustment develops a basic modification in a city government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "sensible" lodging.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing against persons with disabilities to consist of a failure "to design and build" particular brand-new multi-family homes so that they are available to and usable by individuals with impairments, and especially individuals who use wheelchairs. The Act requires all freshly built multi-family homes of 4 or more systems planned for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain features: an accessible entrance on an accessible route, accessible common and public usage locations, doors sufficiently large to accommodate wheelchairs, available paths into and through each residence, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in accessible place, reinforcements in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can navigate about the space.
Developers, builders, owners, and designers responsible for the style or building of brand-new multi-family housing might be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to fulfill these style requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of enforcement actions against those who stopped working to do so. The majority of the cases have been fixed by consent decrees supplying a range of types of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring unattainable features into compliance where practical and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other building requirements) that will offer making other housing systems accessible; training on the availability requirements for those associated with the building procedure; a mandate that all new housing jobs comply with the availability requirements, and monetary relief for those injured by the offenses. In addition, the Department has actually sought to promote accessibility through building codes.
